Look Pivot 2.0 Binding Comparison: Differences Between the 11, 13, 15, and 18

Introduction

Look Pivot bindings have always been one of the easiest to spot in a lift line. The turntable heel, short mounting footprint, and rich color options set them apart from almost every other binding on the wall, and this platform has built up a loyal following among skiers who value a specific underfoot feel. For the 2025 season and into 2026, the range moves to the Pivot 2.0 platform.

This update is narrower in scope than the name suggests. The 2.0 designation refers to the heel piece, which is the single biggest change across the range, alongside the new colorways. The range still spans four models: the Pivot 2.0 11, 13, 15, and 18. They differ in toe construction, spring rate, weight, and price, and it is these four differences that actually determine which one belongs on your skis.

This guide will break down what each model offers, the actual impact of the new heel piece, and the trade-offs that come with the design.

What Defines the Pivot 2.0 Platform

Every binding in the range shares the same core architecture, so before splitting them apart, it makes sense to start with what they have in common.

Elastic travel is the headline figure. The toe offers 45 mm of travel and the heel 28 mm, a fairly generous heel figure compared to other alpine bindings. For reference, the Jester and Griffin sit at about 30 mm toe and 16 mm heel, while the Attack is close at roughly 30 mm and 16 mm. One competitor’s toe reaches 47 mm, but the heel stops at 16 mm. Elastic travel is not just a retention figure; it also acts like suspension, giving the binding a smoother, more forgiving feel before release.

Stand height is the second shared trait. The Pivot sits at roughly a 1 mm drop from heel to toe, making it one of the flattest bindings available. It’s not the lowest — the Attack sits lower — but this nearly level platform feels close to how a skier naturally stands without a binding. Whether that’s an advantage is a matter of personal preference: skiers who like to be pitched forward will notice the difference, while those who want a natural, upright stance tend to love it.

The mounting pattern is short and central. The screws sit directly beneath the boot heel with no track or linkage behind, and the heel does not rotate around a separate pivot. This lets the ski flex more naturally, especially in the tail, and creates a direct, connected feel that’s hard to describe without actually skiing it.

The full metal toe on the upper models delivers very direct power transfer, and durability across the range is a genuine strength. The 15 and 18 are the benchmark, and thanks to the metal construction and small number of moving parts, these bindings are built to last with basic care.

The new 2.0 heel brings several practical changes. Look added material along the sides of the heel tower for reinforcement, and the pole catch area is now metal instead of a piece that could pop out over time. Heel adjustment no longer requires a flathead screwdriver: a pozi drive or an Allen key works, and the fore-aft range has grown to 20 mm, enough to move the heel position between boot sizes. A 105 mm brake joins the range, which now covers 75, 95, 105, and 115 mm widths. An 85 mm option is still missing, which is a gap for skiers on narrower all-mountain skis.

Look Pivot 2.0 11: The Lightweight Option

The 11 is the entry point to the range and the lightest, most affordable model. It uses a composite FDC toe paired with the new 2.0 heel, keeping weight and cost down. That makes it a sensible match for lighter skiers and recreational all-mountain use, rather than hard-charging terrain.

Unofficial updated pricing puts the 11 at $279.95.

Look Pivot 2.0 13: The Middle of the Range

The 13 is effectively the previous 14 with the new 2.0 heel bolted on. It uses a full action toe with wings that move both outward and upward — a different mechanical approach to the same goal the metal toe achieves. It’s also meaningfully lighter than the metal-toe models, at about 330 grams per side, which is a real consideration if you’re building a lighter setup. The updated price is $379.95.

The 13 is the natural choice for skiers who want the Pivot feel without the weight of the aluminum toe, and who don’t need the durability ceiling of the 15 or 18. For most all-mountain skiing, the difference in retention isn’t the limiting factor.

Look Pivot 2.0 15: Full Metal Construction

The 15 steps up to a full aluminum toe — this is where the direct power transfer and durability reputation really come from. It weighs about 500 grams per side, and its spring rate sits below the 18’s, with everything else about the two bindings identical. The 15 is also the most colorful model in the range, with four colorways to choose from.

The updated price for the 15 is $479.95, the same as the 18.

Look Pivot 2.0 18: The Stiffest Spring

The 18 shares its aluminum toe, heel, and overall construction with the 15. The only difference between the two is the spring — the 18’s is stiffer, to suit higher release settings. It’s offered in a blue colorway, and like the 15, it is listed at $479.95 in the updated pricing.

That single spring difference is the whole decision. If your release setting falls in the upper part of the range, the 18 is the right choice; if not, the 15 delivers the same build and the same durability for the same money.

Trade-Offs and Owner Quirks

The Pivot design has a few quirks worth knowing about before you commit.

The heel needs a clean interface. A small amount of snow packed into the heel can prevent it from depressing fully — unnerving on a cold morning, and you may need to clear it out before clicking in.

The brakes sit differently than on most bindings. They hang lower and closer to the ski, which some skiers notice in bumps and narrow stances, and in some cases the brake extensions need to be trimmed so they don’t drag. Replacement turntables are also a cost to keep in mind, and swapping them takes some effort.

Setting forward pressure is trickier than average. The indicator now uses arrows instead of a plain line, which helps, but this remains a job for a certified binding technician rather than a home adjustment. Weight is the last honest trade-off: at about 500 grams per side, the 15 and 18 add noticeable mass, especially on wider skis.

Buying Advice: Matching the Binding to the Ski

Choosing within the range comes down to three questions: how much you weigh, how hard you ski, and how much weight you’re willing to carry.

Lighter skiers and recreational all-mountain skiers will generally be well served by the 11 or 13. The 13 is the more versatile of the two thanks to its lighter weight and mid-range price, and makes a strong case for anyone who wants the Pivot feel on a daily driver.

Heavier skiers, aggressive skiers, and anyone who spends time in freeride terrain should look at the 15. It’s the value pick of the metal-toe pair, and offers the widest color selection for matching a ski graphic.

The 18 only makes sense if your release setting requires the stiffer spring; otherwise, the 15 gives you the same binding for the same price. One further note worth knowing: the Pivot is the binding the CAST system is designed to work with — which matters if touring adaptability is part of your plan.

Conclusion

The Pivot 2.0 range keeps the traits that made the platform distinctive — the turntable heel, short mounting footprint, flat stance, and elastic travel — while refining the heel with better reinforcement and easier adjustment. The 11 and 13 cover lighter and mid-weight skiers, while the 15 and 18 deliver the metal-toe durability the line is known for. Match the model to your weight, terrain, and release setting, and the quirks are easy to live with.