繁體中文 · Hi-Fi Speakers

2026 年最佳 Hi-Fi 揚聲器:兩款脫穎而出的落地式喇叭

兩款定義了這一年的落地式喇叭:一款售價 6,000 美元、專攻通透感的代表作,以及一款通過 THX 認證、價值非凡的大型塔式喇叭。

查看英文版本

前言

有些年份要選出最愛的喇叭很容易,這一年並不是。過去十二個月裡,優秀設計源源不絕地推出,要把範圍縮小到兩款,花的時間遠比預期久。最後的決定落在兩個截然不同的命題上:一款把箱體工程與通透感推到同級極限的喇叭,以及一款以超大體積回饋超乎尋常音樂表現的塔式喇叭。

其中一款奪下年度最佳喇叭的最高榮譽,這個獎項只頒給單一設計。另一款則拿下另一項價值獎,專門保留給相對於價格回饋最豐厚的喇叭。兩者從相反的端點回答同一個問題:落地式喇叭要花到多少錢,才算真正令人滿意?

這兩款喇叭憑什麼佔有一席之地

評選時最看重兩項標準。第一是箱體結構與共振控制,因為在單體開始運動之前,箱體早就形塑了你聽到的絕大多數聲音。第二是全頻段的音色平衡,因為低頻驚人、中頻卻粗糙或高頻尖銳的喇叭,很少能撐過一次長時間聆聽。

動態、通透感,以及消失在音樂背後的能力同樣重要,搭配彈性也是。一款能與各種擴大機合作、又能依所在空間調整的喇叭,長年相處下來就是輕鬆得多。

黃昏時的聆聽室,兩座落地式喇叭分立在單人扶手椅兩側

價值是決勝關鍵。單看價格對一款喇叭說明不了什麼,但那個價格換到什麼,就說明了很多。用料、箱體容積、單體數量、分音器實作品質,以及設計提供多少調校自由,全都會納入這個判斷。以這些標準衡量,這兩款設計在今年聽過的所有喇叭中脫穎而出。

年度最佳整體表現:Mon Acoustic Platon

Platon 獲得年度最佳喇叭獎,沒有其他喇叭得到同樣的肯定。這個決定不只是基於聲音表現,因為這款設計有著一段不尋常的背景故事,而且真的反映在聆聽結果上。

The designer behind the Platon once built a speaker from a rare African tonewood prized for its acoustic properties, sometimes described as a singing or musical wood. The material is exotic, difficult to source, and expensive, so it was never going to work as a production cabinet. Instead, the design moved to aluminium combined with several different materials inside the enclosure, with the goal of getting as close as possible to the character of that original wood.

That approach runs against the usual experience with metal cabinets. Aluminium enclosures often sound metallic, slightly lean, and a little lifeless, and you can usually sense the material behind the music. The Platon does not do that. Its cabinet resonance is very well controlled, and it never tips into sounding overtly metallic or overtly woody. The industrial, clean-cut exterior suggests a hard, clinical presentation, but the sound that comes out does not match that expectation at all.

斜射光下,拉絲鋁製喇叭箱體邊緣的微距特寫

純淨是另一個重點。儘管採用了分音器,Platon 聽起來依然純淨、通透,即使與無分音器的單一單體設計相比也是如此。這份清晰度也延伸到細節處理上:細膩與微妙自然浮現,通透感也從不會變成那種經常糾纏此類解析度設計的明亮感。

It reads as nuanced rather than bright, airy and spacious and sparkly rather than forward. At $6,000 it is clearly not for everyone, and it will reward careful system matching, but the Platon is the speaker that left the deepest impression this year.

箱體設計與鋁材的疑問

鋁在喇叭設計中名聲不佳,其來有自。這種材料堅硬、易於加工,但處理不當的金屬箱體會帶來聽者立刻察覺的硬調與單薄,再好的單體也掩蓋不了。

The Platon sidesteps that problem by treating the enclosure as a system rather than a single material. Aluminium forms the visible structure, while multiple internal materials work together to manage energy inside the cabinet. The result is an enclosure that stays quiet and does not editorialise. It adds almost nothing of its own to the music, which is exactly the goal, and it is the main reason the speaker can sound this transparent without sounding clinical.

That engineering also explains the speaker’s character. This is not a design chasing warmth or romance. It aims at clarity, speed, and a sense of space, and buyers who prefer a softer, more forgiving presentation should look elsewhere.

最佳價值:Arendal 1723 THX 落地式喇叭

第二個獎項頒給 Arendal 1723 THX 塔式喇叭,獲選年度最佳價值喇叭。值得說清楚的是:這是價值獎,不是低價獎,而這裡的價值確實無可爭議。

首先,這個價格換到的箱體與單體硬體規模極大。許多廠商使用 MDF 製作箱體,這完全合理,但 Arendal 選擇了 HDF。它成本更高、表現更好,而且在這個價位、這種體積的箱體上幾乎見不到。單體數量也很大方,雖然單體多不代表聲音自動變好,但這裡的分音器把它們整合得很有條理。頻段不會各自為政、從四面八方湧來,而那正是複雜多單體塔式喇叭常見的失敗模式。

The 1723 THX name reflects THX certification, and that carries real weight. The design went through extensive measurement and testing, and the company publishes its own measurement data. What you hear as a result is a balanced presentation from top to bottom. The bass is impressive without steamrolling the midrange or the treble, and there are no obvious peaks or dips colouring the response. Because these are big towers, they move a lot of air and deliver the dynamic, chest-pounding low end that many listeners actively want, while the midrange and high frequencies stay refined and even.

塔式喇叭的背板,可見三個圓形低音反射孔

一次直接比較讓價值主張更清楚。在 Arendal 系統架設之前,才剛聽過一款售價約 20,000 加幣的塔式喇叭,差異結果很小。那款貴上許多的喇叭在動態衝勁上多一點,極低頻的控制力也多一些,但 Arendal 的高頻表現,在某些方面其實更受青睞。

Flexibility rounds out the package. The speakers are sensitive enough to run happily with tube amplifiers, so you are free to choose your own amplifier, DSP, or room correction rather than being locked into one approach. The three-port system lets you plug all three ports for a fully sealed alignment or leave some open to tune the low-frequency roll-off to your room. Soundstaging is the one area with room to improve, and a tube integrated amplifier helps there, but nothing else at this price comes close on overall value.

反射孔調音與擴大機搭配彈性

1723 THX 的三孔設計比乍看之下更有用。把三個孔全塞住,就能把喇叭轉為全密閉設計,以可預期的方式收緊並滾降低頻。留一或兩個孔開放,則能恢復不同程度的低頻補強。在真實空間裡,低頻行為會隨擺位與家具劇烈變化,這種調整能力價值非凡。

擴大機的自由度同樣重要。由於喇叭靈敏度足以搭配真空管設計,用家可以用真空管綜合擴大機追求更溫暖、更有立體感的表現,或改用高電流晶體機換取控制力與抓地力。再外掛 DSP 或空間校正也很簡單。這個價位帶的大型塔式喇叭中,很少有提供這麼多實驗空間的。

The trade-off is size. This is a near full-range tower, and it needs a room that can accommodate it properly. Buyers in smaller spaces should think carefully before committing.

入手前該權衡的取捨

兩款喇叭都不是完美無缺,誠實面對這一點會讓選擇更容易。

The Platon sits at $6,000, which places it well beyond casual spending, and it asks for well-matched equipment to give its best. Its transparency-first character also means it will not flatter poor recordings or soft, warm-leaning systems.

The Arendal is far more attainable, but it is a physically large speaker that needs space to breathe. Its soundstaging, while good, is the weakest part of an otherwise exceptional package, and closing all three ports to run sealed means giving up some of the low-end output that makes the design so entertaining in the first place.

兩款喇叭都值得用心調整。擺位、擴大機搭配,以及對位置多一分耐心,對兩者的助益都勝過添購任何配件。

選購建議:讓喇叭契合你的空間與系統

先從空間開始,而不是從喇叭開始。像 1723 THX 這樣近乎全頻段的塔式喇叭,需要足夠空間才不會低頻轟鳴;而像 Platon 這般以通透感為主的設計,則受益於安靜、經過良好處理的環境,讓它的清晰度與音場能好好發揮。

If your priority is purity, transparency, and a holographic soundstage, and your budget can stretch to $6,000, the Mon Acoustic Platon is the more rewarding speaker of the two. It asks more of the rest of your system, but it gives back detail and nuance that are hard to find anywhere near the price.

俯拍平放的反射孔塞、喇叭角錐、線材與捲尺

If you want a large, dynamic, balanced tower that delivers far more than its price suggests, the Arendal 1723 THX is the straightforward recommendation. Its HDF cabinet, coherent multi-driver array, THX certification, published measurements, three-port tuning, and tube-amplifier friendliness add up to a package that is difficult to beat on value. Plan for the footprint, budget for a capable amplifier, and it will serve as the foundation of a system for years.

結語

兩個獎項,兩款截然不同的喇叭。Mon Acoustic Platon 憑藉箱體工程、純淨度,以及搭配得當時能漂亮展開的音場,拿下年度最佳喇叭頭銜,價格也反映了它的高度專業化。Arendal 1723 THX 則以遠低於這類組合通常所需的代價,帶來龐大、扎實、均衡且真正具備調校彈性的塔式喇叭,贏得價值獎。

只要符合你的空間與系統,兩款都可以放心入手。Platon 是追求通透感極致的聆聽者之選,1723 THX 則適合想要龐大、動感、誠實的喇叭,又不願為品牌標誌多付溢價的人。

延伸閱讀

相關評測

ATC SCM20 ASL 評測:中頻表現出眾的主動式書架喇叭

Hi-Fi Speakers

ATC SCM20 ASL 評測:中頻表現出眾的主動式書架喇叭

深入剖析 ATC 的 SCM20 ASL 主動式書架喇叭,涵蓋其單體設計、內建擴大機、調校選項,以及入手前該考量的重點。

2026/9/27
ATC SCM20 評測:具備同級最佳中頻的旗艦級兩音路書架喇叭

Hi-Fi Speakers

ATC SCM20 評測:具備同級最佳中頻的旗艦級兩音路書架喇叭

深入檢視 ATC 的旗艦兩音路書架喇叭,從 SL 中低音單體、半球形中音單體,到密閉式箱體的低頻限制、擺位需求與擴大機驅動要求。

2026/9/27
Pair of tall black floorstanding speakers with curved cabinets in a minimal listening room

Hi-Fi Speakers

ATC SCM40 評測:深沉低頻、傳奇中頻,以及挑剔的個性

ATC SCM40 是進入 ATC 75 mm 軟半球中音單體世界最實惠的途徑。以下說明它的低頻量感、中頻豐潤度與擺位要求對買家代表什麼意義。

2026/9/27