Running Shoes
Nike Vomero 17 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13: Two Premium Daily Trainers With Very Different Personalities
Both are premium neutral daily trainers, but one leans firmer and bouncier while the other is the softest shoe in the category. Here is how to choose.
Introduction
The Nike Vomero 17 and the New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v13 sit in the same premium neutral daily trainer category, yet they could not be more different in practice. Both received substantial overhauls compared to their prior versions: the Vomero 17 gained a new upper and a top layer of ZoomX foam, while the 1080 v13 was completely redone with a new Fresh Foam X formula.
Because of that, this is less a case of one shoe being better and more a case of picking the tool that matches your runs. The Vomero 17 is the firmer, slightly bouncier, more traditional option that can even handle some uptempo work. The 1080 v13 is the softest, most compliant shoe in this comparison, tuned almost entirely for easy and recovery miles.

Specs at a Glance
The Vomero 17 comes in at 10.1 oz for men’s size 9 and 8.5 oz for women’s size 8, with a 39 mm heel and 29 mm forefoot stack for a 10 mm drop. The 1080 v13 is lighter at 9.2 oz for men’s size 9 and 7.3 oz for women’s size 8, with a 38 mm heel and 32 mm forefoot for a 6 mm drop.
That drop difference is noticeable out on the road, though not in a bad way. It shapes much of how each shoe rides, from heel transition to toe-off.
Ride and Performance
The Vomero 17 has a slightly firmer ride with some bounce to it. It rolls along in a more traditional way despite the high stack, and that makes it a genuinely reliable daily trainer. It works very well for easy miles and long runs, and it can even stretch to a little uptempo work, which is more than most shoes this soft-adjacent can claim.

The 1080 v13 is a different animal entirely. This is the softest shoe in this comparison by a wide margin, with compliance from heel to forefoot. The foam compresses wherever you land and stays there, so it is not a bouncy or resilient ride. It is soft, cushioned, and best saved for easy and recovery miles. It is also comfortable enough to double as an all-day walking shoe, something the Vomero handles less naturally.
One ride note on the Vomero: the forefoot feels slightly stiff through toe-off at first, almost like the shoe rides a touch long. That impression fades after about a mile. The 1080’s forefoot rocker, by contrast, rolls smoothly from the first step.
Heel Transition
Both shoes feature nicely beveled heels that produce a smooth rear-foot transition. The lower drop of the 1080 makes it feel buttery smooth through the heel. The Vomero 17’s higher drop is still well managed, with just a little more heel noticeable underfoot, though never clunky.
If you want the smoothest possible ride in the rear foot, the 1080 has the edge. If you do not mind a higher drop, the Vomero’s heel still transitions very well.
Stability and Feel
Neither of these is a stability shoe, but they sit differently on the neutral spectrum. The Vomero 17 is the more stable of the two while remaining fully neutral, with sidewalls in the heel that help it feel secure despite the ZoomX foam. That slight firmness also means it holds up better over longer efforts.

The 1080 v13 has wider features, including a wider sole and mild midfoot sidewalls, but the foam is so soft that it leans toward the unstable side of neutral. That is not a flaw, just a character trait. Runners with stiff, stable mechanics are likely to do very well in it, while anyone needing a touch of guidance should look at the Vomero first.
Fit and Comfort
Fit is where these two diverge sharply. The Vomero 17 sits low in volume throughout, especially in the forefoot and toe box, yet laces down securely without much tightening. The 1080 v13 offers quite a bit more volume and needed the laces, particularly through the midfoot, tightened down for a secure fit.
Both shoes have slightly stiffer heel counters, but the heel collar cushioning is generous enough that it was not an issue. Runners who are moderately sensitive to stiff heel counters should be fine; those who are highly sensitive may notice it until the shoe breaks in.

Durability
The Vomero 17 wears like a tank. After more than 50 miles, the heel shows barely any wear. The 1080 v13, likely because its softer foam compresses more, shows wear a little sooner. Realistically, both should deliver plenty of miles, but the firmer Vomero has the durability edge.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Vomero 17 if you want a dependable daily trainer that covers easy runs, long runs, and even a bit of uptempo work, and if you prefer a slightly firmer, more stable platform. Choose the 1080 v13 if maximum cushioning is the priority, whether for recovery miles, easy plotting, or comfortable all-day wear.
Conclusion
These two shoes prove that the same category can hold very different products. The Vomero 17 is the versatile, durable, slightly firmer daily workhorse, while the 1080 v13 is the plush, ultra-soft cruiser for easy days. Match the shoe to your runs and both are easy to recommend.
Product link
View more details for Nike Vomero 17
This product is mentioned in the review. Check the specifications, options, and compatibility before buying.
View more details for Nike Vomero 17