Running Shoes
Brooks Glycerin Max 2 vs Mag Max 2: Two Max Cushion Shoes With Very Different Personalities
The Glycerin Max 2 has divided the running community, while the Mag Max 2 has been widely welcomed. Here is how they compare on fit, geometry, and who each shoe is actually for.
Introduction
Few max cushion shoes have divided runners quite like the Brooks Glycerin Max 2. The original Glycerin Max was an instant classic: a huge stack, an oversized logo spilling onto the midsole, and DNA tuned foam that was slightly softer in the heel and firmer in the forefoot. People loved it.
The sequel has landed very differently. It has taken plenty of criticism since its release, yet not everyone dislikes it. Plenty of runners, ourselves included, came away from it positively. Put it next to the Brooks Mag Max 2, which has been receiving far warmer reviews, and a clearer picture emerges: these two shoes have almost swapped roles, and each suits a distinctly different type of runner.
Why the Glycerin Max 2 Is So Polarizing
The Glycerin Max 2 is a 45 to 50mm stack shoe, heavier than typical daily trainers, built with a foam type and an aggressive geometry you do not see often. The upper sits on a new last borrowed from the standard Glycerin, making it noticeably snugger and more streamlined than the voluminous original.
The big change, though, is inside the shoe. The rocker point and toe spring have moved further forward, creating a low-drop feeling and a firmer, more propulsive character. That is the number one thing to understand about this update: it is not a bad shoe, it is a polarizing one. If you expect the plush, sink-in softness of something like the New Balance 1080v14, this will feel firm and unfamiliar.

Fit and Feel Compared
On foot, the two shoes are almost opposites. The Glycerin Max 2 feels snug in the forefoot, more dialed, and clearly built for a performance-leaning fit. Its geometry has an almost shark-finned, angular design language with a pronounced toe spring you can genuinely feel pushing you forward.
The Mag Max 2 went the other direction. Its upper was widened out to the point where it feels nearly ultra spacious, the geometry sits flatter underfoot, and the heel feels noticeably softer. Where the original Mag Max was the narrower, speedier option, that role now belongs to the Glycerin Max 2.

Ride Character: Protection With Range
The Glycerin Max 2 rewards a midfoot landing. There is a specific bounce zone in this shoe, much like the Adizero Adios Pro 4: land in that midfoot spot and the geometry rolls you along with a satisfying pop off the front of the rocker. It works for heel landings and forefoot landings too, but the midfoot sweet spot is where it shines.
It is not a workout shoe. Think recovery runs up to steady efforts, some high zone 2 and zone 3 work, all with a dense, protective platform underneath. Coming off a 21-mile long run, it felt genuinely protective, and the rocker makes it easier to push the pace than in the Mag Max 2 while still feeling banged up.

The Mag Max 2, by contrast, is a true recovery shoe. It wants you to land on the heel and shuffle along in a relaxed form. It is stable, comfortable, and forgiving, but it has less range. If your easy pace drops below eight-minute miles, the Glycerin Max 2 is the better tool for staying protected while picking things up.
Which One Should You Buy
Both shoes make sense, and neither deserves to be written off. The Glycerin Max 2 is for runners who land more midfoot or forefoot, want a protective max cushion platform that can still move, and do not mind a firmer feel with a snugger upper. If you have higher-volume feet or loved the baggy fit of the original, be aware the fit has changed considerably.

The Mag Max 2 is for heel strikers who want maximum comfort, stability at the back of the shoe, and a relaxed recovery ride. It is the more traditional-feeling shoe of the pair, lower to the ground and more forgiving in the upper.
A note on expectations: this is roughly a $200 max cushion shoe from one of the most reliable brands in running, and there are very few truly bad shoes at that level. The Glycerin Max 2 is not a crowd-pleaser with a high hit rate like the Vomero Plus; it is a niche shoe that works brilliantly for the right mechanics. If that description matches your stride, it deserves a genuine look despite the mixed reception.
Conclusion
The Glycerin Max 2 and Mag Max 2 are both solid max cushion trainers that serve opposite purposes. Choose the Glycerin Max 2 if you want protective mileage with a propulsive rocker and a performance fit. Choose the Mag Max 2 if you want a plush, stable, heel-friendly recovery shoe with a roomy upper. Neither is the best shoe ever made, and neither is trash. The right answer depends entirely on how you land.
Product link
View more details for Brooks Glycerin Max 2
This product is mentioned in the review. Check the specifications, options, and compatibility before buying.
View more details for Brooks Glycerin Max 2