Running Shoes

Best Value Road Running Shoes: Saucony Axon 3 vs Asics Dynablast 3

Two budget-friendly daily trainers compared: the $89 Saucony Axon 3 with bio-based midsole foam and the Asics Dynablast 3 around the $99 mark.

Saucony Axon 3 and Asics Dynablast 3 running shoes side by side on concrete

Introduction

Value running shoes are getting genuinely good, and two recent daily trainers prove the point. The Saucony Axon 3 lands at $89, undercutting most of its competition while weighing a startling 7.5 to 7.6 ounces in a typical men’s size. The Asics Dynablast 3, reviewed a few months earlier, still hovers right around $99. Both aim at the same job: racking up comfortable daily training miles without draining your wallet.

If you have been putting off a new pair because of the price of premium supershoes, this comparison is for you. Neither shoe tries to be a race weapon. Both are honest, durable trainers that get the job done.

Saucony Axon 3: Lightweight and Surprisingly Cheap

The headline here is the weight. At 7.5 to 7.6 ounces in a men’s size 9-ish, the Axon 3 is remarkably light for a budget trainer, and a lot of that comes down to the midsole. Saucony is using PWRRUN BIO, a bio-based foam made in part from sugar cane. It feels a little different from the brand’s standard PB midsole compounds at first, but it delivers a lively, responsive ride.

At $89, this is the kind of shoe you can buy on impulse and not think twice. It is positioned squarely as a value pick, and it punches well above that price in most of the categories that matter.

Close-up of a thick pale road running shoe midsole resting on grey concrete

Ride and Midsole Feel

The midsole durometer came in around 38 to 43 on the hardness scale, which is a little firmer than the 30 to 35 range most easy-day trainers sit in. Compared with the Axon 2, the Axon 3 has softened up noticeably, with a bit more energy return as well. If you picked up the Axon 2 for $100, expect the newer version to feel slightly plusher underfoot.

For easy days it works well. For tempo work it is capable but not the star of the show. Runners who prefer a really soft, floaty easy-day ride may want something in the low 30s durometer range instead.

Durability and Outsole

This is where the Axon 3 quietly wins. The outsole uses roughly two to three millimeters of rubber, well placed rather than fully plastered across the sole. That is plenty of material to wear through, and the long-term outlook is strong. Heel strikers in particular should get serious mileage, since the heel landing zone is generously covered.

Underside of a road running shoe outsole showing thick rubber coverage

Expect this shoe to keep going mile after mile. If you log big weeks and hate replacing shoes every three months, that alone justifies the price.

Fit and Upper

The fit was comfortable with no real issues. There is plenty of room in the toe box, so runners with slightly wider feet should be able to wear it without problems. The midfoot felt normal and the heel pocket was decent.

The upper is the average part of this shoe. The tongue is barely gusseted, breathability is not high on the scale, and the heel counter lacks extra padding. That said, the eyelet chain is genuinely nice: wide enough to let the laces do their job properly, and lockdown held up well in testing. There is also a small pull tab at the heel for easy on-off.

Top-down view of a running shoe upper showing lacing and tongue

Asics Dynablast 3: The Other Budget Contender

The Asics Dynablast 3, covered a few months back, is the natural comparison at roughly $99. It is a solid value daily trainer with a comfortable ride, and it remains a good pick if you find it at that price. But with the Axon 3 now sitting at $89.89 in some places, the Saucony undercuts it by about ten dollars while being lighter.

The Dynablast 3 is still worth considering, especially if you prefer Asics’ fit or find it discounted. But if the choice is purely about value per mile, the Axon 3 currently has the edge.

Which One Should You Buy?

For most runners, the Saucony Axon 3 is the easy call right now. It costs less, weighs less, uses a bio-based midsole foam, and has an outsole built to last. The main trade-offs are an average upper with modest breathability and a slightly firmer ride than some easy-day purists would like.

Go with the Dynablast 3 if you prefer its fit or find it at a similar price. Otherwise, the risk of trying an $89 shoe is about as low as it gets, and the reward is one of the best value buys in road running right now.

Two daily trainer running shoes side by side on a neutral surface

Conclusion

The Saucony Axon 3 earns its place as a standout value trainer: featherweight for the price, softer than its predecessor, and built with an outsole that should keep going for hundreds of miles. The Asics Dynablast 3 remains a respectable alternative around $99. If pinching pennies matters to you, the Axon 3 is the shoe to grab before it sells out.

Further reading

Related Reviews

Nike Pegasus Trail 5, On Cloudsurfer Trail, and Merrell Nova 4 running shoes on concrete

Running Shoes

Best Road-to-Trail Running Shoes: Three Versatile Options for Mixed Terrain

A practical guide to three road-to-trail running shoes that handle both pavement and mild trails, with clear strengths and trade-offs for different runner types.

6/27/2026
Three running shoes displayed side by side on concrete: Asics Gel Kayano 31, Brooks Ghost 16, and ON Cloudsurfer 7

Running Shoes

Best Running Shoes for Achilles Tendonitis: Three Options Explained

Three running shoes with different heel drops and support features designed to help reduce Achilles tendon pain during walking and running.

6/29/2026
Five women's running shoes arranged in descending staircase pattern on concrete

Running Shoes

Best Running Shoes for Women: Five Top Choices Ranked

A ranked guide to five women's running shoes, from versatile daily trainers to high-performance racing options, with real strengths and trade-offs for each.

6/27/2026