Camping Stoves

Esbit Solid Fuel Stove Large Size Review: Bigger, But Not Better

The largest version of a classic folding hexamine stove is simple to use and reliable in cold weather, but wide pot supports, no windscreen and faster fuel burn limit its appeal.

Folded galvanized steel solid fuel stove beside a stack of hexamine tablets on concrete

Introduction

The folding solid fuel stove is one of the most enduring pieces of outdoor equipment, and this design traces back to the 1930s, when a German company first put it into production. Since then it has been carried by rescue organizations, military forces, backpackers and campers alike. It is a proven concept. The version under review here, however, is the largest of the three sizes available, and size changes the equation.

The large size weighs 6.1 oz on its own and folds down to 5 in by 3 in by 1.5 in. It ships with a full box of fuel, and the folded body can hold up to 12 tablets. On paper that sounds like more of a good thing. In practice, the extra width of the pot supports turns this into a far more specific product than its smaller siblings.

Who This Product Is For

This stove is for a narrow group of users. Because the pot supports sit 5 in apart when raised, the large size only works well with cookware that matches that footprint. If your kit is built around one wide-based pot or pan, the stove can do the job. If you want a single stove that handles whatever cup, pot or pan you happen to pack, the large size is the wrong choice.

Overhead flat-lay of a compact camp kitchen with a folded stove, fuel box and cup

That is the central trade-off. The smaller versions of this stove accept almost any size of cookware and perform at least as well, while the large size asks you to adapt your kit around it. Buyers who already carry wide cookware get a stable, simple platform. Everyone else gets a stove that spends more time in storage than on the trail.

Main Strengths

Setup and pack-down are about as simple as it gets. The body unfolds into three leg positions, the burner plate sits in the centre with air holes around it, and the whole thing collapses flat again in seconds. The large burner plate is designed for 27 g tablets, and it will also take 14 g tablets or smaller ones.

The stove also cools quickly once the fuel has burned out, which matters when you want to pack up and move on. The pot supports adjust across those three positions, so there is some flexibility, even though the range has limits.

Weight is reasonable for the capacity. The stove alone is 6.1 oz, and with 12 tablets loaded inside it comes to 12.4 oz.

The fuel itself has genuine strengths. Hexamine is a solid tablet that lights in a few seconds with an open flame, and it performs well at higher elevations and in subzero conditions. For an emergency kit or a cold-weather backup, that kind of reliability is worth a lot.

How It Performs in the Field

Three 14 g tablets brought water to a rolling boil in 8 minutes 42 seconds. That result came with a caveat that defines the stove: there is no windscreen, and even a light breeze pushed the flames around and carried heat away from the pot instead of into it.

Solid fuel stove burning under a pot beside a lakeshore campsite at dusk

Fuel economy is the other performance gap. In the smaller versions of this stove, a tablet burns for roughly 15 minutes. In the large size, that figure drops to around 10 minutes per tablet, which is a meaningful downgrade. The wider body leaves more room for heat to escape around the pot rather than transferring into it, so you spend more fuel for the same result.

Things to Consider Before Buying

Pot compatibility is the biggest issue. With the supports raised, a 750 ml cup drops into the middle of the platform with plenty of room to spare, and it is not properly held. Folding the legs inward helps only so much: at the first folded position the platform is still too wide, and at the lowest position the cup finally rests on the supports but is not secure or stable. A stove that unstable is not something to rely on.

Close-up of stove pot support arms with a stainless cup resting across them

Larger cookware does not solve the problem either. A bigger pot still does not seat well, and the practical workaround is to turn it sideways and balance it across the supports.

Efficiency is the second consideration. Compared with the smaller versions, the large size is less effective because more of the burner sits exposed, and without a windscreen there is nothing to keep that heat where it belongs.

Price is the third. This is an expensive folding stove for something made from galvanized steel, and the smaller versions represent noticeably better value for the same core idea.

Fuel Handling and Safety Notes

Hexamine is effective, but it demands respect. It has a strong, sharp odour that some people find unpleasant, and the smell is noticeable straight through the packaging, so double bagging the tablets in sealed bags is a sensible habit for anyone storing this stove in a pack.

The fuel is toxic. Do not breathe the dust or the vapours while it burns, wash your hands after handling it, and wear gloves as a precaution. It also leaves a considerable amount of residue behind, which means your pot or cup will need washing after every use. In windy conditions, getting the tablets to light in the first place can be difficult on its own.

Buying Advice

For most buyers, the smaller versions of this stove are the better purchase. They are more versatile, they cost less, and they include a windscreen, which the large size does not. They also deliver better fuel economy and hold a wider range of cookware, so they cover more trips with less compromise.

Morning campsite cook kit on a granite slab with pine trees in the mist

The large size makes sense in one scenario: you already own wide-based cookware that fits the 5 in support spacing, and you want the extra fuel capacity of the larger folded body. Outside of that, the extra size works against the stove rather than for it, and the money is better spent elsewhere in the same range.

Conclusion

The large size of this solid fuel stove is a capable piece of equipment in the narrow circumstances it was designed for, but those circumstances are limited. It is simple to use, it lights reliably, and the fuel performs in cold and at altitude. Against that, the pot supports are too wide for most cookware, there is no windscreen, fuel burns faster than in the smaller versions, and the price is high for galvanized steel. For the majority of campers, the medium or small versions are the smarter buy.

Product link

View more details for Esbit Solid Fuel Stove Large Size

This product is mentioned in the review. Check the specifications, options, and compatibility before buying.

View more details for Esbit Solid Fuel Stove Large Size

Further reading

Related Reviews

Small folding camp stove beside a stainless steel cup on a concrete surface

Camping Stoves

BCB Fire Dragon Mini Cooker Review: A Tiny Folding Stove With Real Trade-Offs

A palm-sized, fuel-flexible folding stove that heats water well enough, but brings flame control, stability, and fuel cost questions worth understanding first.

9/26/2026
Titanium alcohol burner, folding stove stand, and drawstring stuff sack on a concrete surface

Camping Stoves

Boundless Voyage Titanium Alcohol and Wood Stove Review: Ultralight Cooking, Two Ways

A titanium alcohol and wood burning stove kit that weighs 4.5 oz complete, boils two cups of water in about 10 minutes, and costs $36.

9/26/2026
Slim folding dual burner camping stove half opened on a concrete surface

Camping Stoves

BRS 32 Dual Burner Stove Review: A Folding Two-Burner That Packs Down Flat

A detailed look at the BRS 32, a slim folding dual burner camping stove that expands into a stable cooking platform for around $60.

9/26/2026